In the weeks during the US presidential
election campaign, the name Donald Trump became
a common sight in the web – be it in news portals or on social media. And, just
as news that seem to always be brought into the spotlight, they were not
exactly of the most commendable sort. In almost every piece I happened across during
that period, Trump was condemned, criticised and mocked for his stances. These
stances seem to be mainly centered on clamping
down immigration,
building a wall between US and Mexico, banning Muslims from the country,
abolishing environmental protection, his scandals,
sexism, etc.
The major secular media I came across
portrayed Trump in a negative light, highlighting the outrageous comments made
by him (though currently this seems to be balancing slightly more evenly during
the time of writing). Yet, to a man (or in this case, a portal) they seemingly
ignore other issues he addressed, for instance securing jobs for local American
citizens. I cannot help but compare this to a similar situation occurring at
the opposite end of the world – in Malaysia. On one hand you have its local
newspapers portraying the reigning government as the one shining beacon of the
country, with the opposition seeking to incite division and rebellion among the
citizens. In contrast, the international media and internet websites project
the opposition as champions for clean politics, a light that shines amidst a
corrupt and oppressive government.
Now I am not saying I support Trump – or
Hillary for that matter. Each has their own shortcomings, and this is beside
the point of this article. Each has their faults,
but what many tend overlook is that each has their strengths
as well.
People are inclined to hear only what
they want to hear. To a modern day educated urban citizen, perhaps his/her
interests lean toward environmental conservation, gender equality, freedom of
expression and openness to novel ideas. As long as I and those close to me are
safe and doing fine, shouldn’t I be free to pursue what interests me? To a poor
barely-schooled resident in a rural district however, he/she is more likely to
be concerned with bread and butter issues and having a steady source of income
to support themselves or their family. Who really cares about the environment
or have the leisure creative expression if I cannot secure the basic
necessities of life?
This is thus my conjecture. When the
Democrats lost to the Republicans, many of these “moderate progressive”
liberals refuse to accept this outcome – some going as far as to push for a
secession from the US (eg: Calexit). This group is made up of middle to upper-class
income earners: those who have access to proper education, tech-savvy and leading
a more-or-less comfortable lives. Their exposure
and formal credentials/achievements cause them to see themselves as
well-informed, wiser and more intelligent than those living in the countryside.
And it is precisely because of this that they cannot understand nor accept the
reasons of the people who voted contrary to their ideals. A quick tour
on MSN featured articles seem to prove this: those who voted for Trump are sexist, racist, Islamophobic or just plain stupid. But they cannot – or perhaps would
not – see it in the eyes of those who behold a bleak future, who are struggling
to make ends meet, simply because they have never tasted its unadulterated
bitterness.
The situation above inevitably led me to
compare it with the plight Christians are facing. In similar fashion, Jesus and
His Apostles who lived by the Gospel are persecuted and derided by people of
the supposedly educated and progressive lot. Because the latter are intelligent
they declare their refusal to believe in “some fairy tale story of an almighty
creator watching over everything.” The relevance of 1 Corinthians
1:22:23 remains strong even after over 2000 years.
Even if someone manages to provide a
rational/logical explanation, they will refuse to accept it – just as the Jews
in Acts 6:10-11, and just as the Americans now
who refuse to accept the results of the presidential election. This made me
recall a line from a piece I read many years ago: when an atheist was invited
to debate with a pastor, he declined saying that it
is impossible to hold a logical discussion over a fictional storybook.
They cannot empathise with them, simply because they refuse the first step of
acknowledging the possibility that He exist. Meanwhile those people beyond the
convenience of city life are similar to those who make up the Body of Christ.
Not in the sense of their spirituality perhaps, but on their emphasis on the
fundamental necessities of life. Much like the latter half of Psalms 131:1, “…I do not
occupy myself with things too great and too marvellous for me.”
Perhaps in an environment where
everything is placed on fast track, those in the city – myself included – have
forgotten to cherish the simple things in life. So caught up are we in our own
endeavours we sometimes tend to discount the issues of those close us, what
more of others living a few hundred miles away from our district in some
backcountry.
Yet, just as the democrats living in the
major cities of US learned, to sideline them is to sideline a great number of hopes
and dreams of her people. Like the upper-class Jews in Jesus’ day, the
Pharisees, scribes and priests who scorned the lower-class society treated
Jesus with the same contempt on the Cross. Ultimately, it
is the poor, maimed, blind, lame, those on the highways and hedges (Luke 24:21,23), even the tax
collectors and harlots (Matthew 21:31)
that made their way into the Kingdom of Heaven. Those who are not trapped by
the snares of the world (Luke 8:7,14), who have
little/nothing to lose, and thus decided to put their faith into the untested
water.
This case serves as a solemn reminder
that the media-fed contemporary wisdom and intelligence
does not necessarily portray/cover an entire story in an even light. In
the end, one must consider the subject/views from all
angles, and then exercise discretion based on his/her consciousness and
guidance of the Holy Spirit. Never discard a person’s hopes especially for
their desire on the basic necessities of life, for one day this may return to
bite us in our heels.
RFG
always.
No comments:
Post a Comment